My argument in this post is a response to an argument on LinkedIn focused on the shift in legal and organizational practices, with courts and the EEOC (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) allegedly prioritizing "Merit, Excellence, and Inclusion" (MEI) over "Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion" (DEI). They argued that prioritizing MEI over DEI promotes fairness by emphasizing qualifications over race or gender, particularly in the wake of the Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard decision. I love fairness. We should all practice fairness. Since we are talking about fairness, we must also clarify the intent of DEI, the application of DEI practices, and the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling. That said, I will do my best to highlight the crucial role of fairness in both DEI and MEI.
1. First, I will begin with the misinterpretation of DEI's goal, which, unfortunately, many people get wrong due to the nature of our polarized society. DEI was never meant to take a product, service, position, or item from one qualified group and give it to another unqualified group. This assumes that DEI involves promoting unqualified individuals solely based on race or gender. This needs to be clarified. Furthermore, DEI is not about lowering standards. Instead, DEI intended to ensure that qualified individuals from underrepresented backgrounds are given fair consideration and access opportunities they might otherwise be denied due to systemic biases.
The intent and aim of DEI initiatives was to create environments where everyone, regardless of their background, has an equal chance to succeed based on their merits and abilities. Moreover, the claim that DEI initiatives conflict with merit-based hiring or college admission is erroneous.
2. Yes, the Supreme Court's decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard addressed race-conscious admissions policies in higher education, but it did not directly concern hiring or employment practices. The ruling focused explicitly on whether colleges or universities could use race as one of the factors in college admissions to create a diverse student body. While the Court ruled that race could not be the deciding factor in admissions decisions, this does not imply that companies and organizations must abandon diversity and inclusion initiatives in their hiring practices.
Most individuals from the BIPOC community would agree with the principle of being evaluated based on their merits and qualifications. The real challenge is that systemic barriers, such as lack of access to resources and opportunities, often prevent these individuals from being on an equal footing. Despite these obstacles, many work tirelessly to excel and demonstrate their capabilities.
This perseverance is reminiscent of the fictional character Rocky Balboa from the Rocky films. Balboa, an underdog Italian-American boxer from the streets of Philadelphia, faced countless struggles to become a champion. What made his story so powerful was not that he asked for a title based on who he was or where he came from but that he pushed himself to the limits, hoping that someone would recognize his talent and potential.
Similarly, many talented individuals from underrepresented backgrounds strive to be seen for their abilities rather than as beneficiaries of race-based considerations. Their goal is not special treatment but a fair chance to prove themselves and be acknowledged for their skills and dedication. Like Rocky, they want their hard work and excellence to speak for themselves.
3. Regarding your argument about the role of federal anti-discrimination laws, your argument asserts that race-specific hiring practices violate Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and Section 1981. However, DEI initiatives do not require race-based hiring; they focus on eliminating biases in recruitment, promotion, and retention practices to ensure that everyone, regardless of background, is evaluated fairly. While explicit quotas or race-based preferences may be legally questionable, efforts to broaden the pool of candidates to include those from historically marginalized groups are still within legal bounds. The EEOC continues to support initiatives that promote workplace inclusion as long as they align with anti-discrimination laws.
4. Let us discuss Merit, Excellence, and Inclusion (MEI). Merit and Inclusion are not Mutually exclusive with DEI. The argument that MEI should replace DEI needs to address the principles of equity and Inclusion. In reality, promoting Diversity and fostering an inclusive environment does not conflict with merit. Research has shown that diverse teams are often more innovative, productive, and effective in organizations that foster DEI. By incorporating DEI principles, these organizations have attracted skilled and talented individuals and retained and leveraged a broader range of talent, thus enhancing overall excellence and performance. Please remember that DEI is about expanding the definition of "merit" to include a variety of skills, perspectives, and experiences that are valuable in a global economy, and it plays a crucial role in promoting fairness and equal opportunities.
5. The push for a merit-based system assumes that a "colorblind" approach is inherently fair. However, this perspective ignores the structural and historical disadvantages faced by certain groups, which can limit their access to opportunities in the first place. I want to emphasize this critical point. DEI is still important is to recognize merit, which can only be fairly assessed by considering the unequal starting points and barriers different groups face. True fairness means acknowledging and addressing these disparities, not pretending they don't exist.
Therefore, prioritizing MEI over DEI rests on a flawed understanding of what DEI was designed to achieve. With due respect, please remember, sir, Diversity, equity, and Inclusion are not meant to undermine merit or excellence. Instead, they are meant as a tool to ensure that everyone has an equal shot at demonstrating their abilities in the first place, given our history of race in the United States of America. In addition, the Supreme Court's ruling on college admissions does not necessarily translate into a wholesale rejection of diversity initiatives in employment. Instead, it should prompt organizations to refine their approaches to inclusivity, ensuring they comply with legal standards while fostering diverse and innovative workplaces.
It's crucial to remember that DEI is not a hindrance to merit-based practices but a tool to promote fairness and equal opportunities. This reassurance should help dispel misconceptions about the relationship between DEI and merit-based practices.
Organizations that leverage the strengths of a diverse workforce comply with fairness principles and position themselves for long-term success in a competitive global market. Moreover, when properly implemented, emphasizing Diversity and Inclusion aligns seamlessly with merit, excellence, and Inclusion—enhancing, rather than detracting from, performance and organizational effectiveness. This underscores the importance of DEI in today's professional landscape.
Authored by Dr. Olufade
Embrace every challenge as an invitation to uncover your true potential. In the world of STEAM, curiosity isn't just a tool—it's the spark that ignites innovation, while passion carves the path to lasting impact. Your journey isn't just about mastering knowledge; it's about using your unique talents to illuminate the way for others. Dare to dream big, work with unwavering dedication, and let your light shine brilliantly." Choose STEAM Careers: Shape the Future, Design Your Destiny! ~ Dr. Ayo Olufade, PhD
Comments